Using Science to Help You Catch More Fish

Sometimes catching fish can seem simple, and other times it is more of a challenge. While people often assume that they are not catching fish because there are none there, or because the fish just aren’t biting, scientific data from the lakes will usually show neither of these assumptions to be true. In this blog post, we will look at some studies that might help you be more successful fishing lakes.

When the going gets tough, many anglers turn to their tackle or fly box to look for a solution. However, too much focus on what is on the end of your line might distract you from noting that you are passing your lure or fly through effectively empty water. Investigations have often shown how fish move in predictable patterns, and are often concentrated into a very small portion of the available water. Let’s look at a couple of examples.



In the late 1990s, several papers were published to understand predation (cannibalism) of juvenile rainbow trout. These experiments were not meant to address fishing specifically, but one (Post et al., 1998) has some highly informative data in this regard. Small fish were tethered in lakes, using light fishing line, at specific depths (0.5 metre and five metres) and locations (close or far from shore). The rate at which they were eaten by larger rainbow trout was then recorded. In this very controlled scenario, the deeper-tethered fish were always hit at a higher rate than those held closer to the surface. The difference was often dramatic. As an example, in one lake, 53 hits were recorded at the deeper depth versus only three at the shallower one. Translating this into a fishing context, we can say that two anglers using the exact same lure would report markedly different catches: one would only catch three fish, while the other would catch 53! However, as always with fishing, such patterns change throughout the day, and over the seasons. These trials were conducted in summer, but it would not be surprising to see the results reversed in spring when water is much cooler near the surface.



Another good example comes from research on smallmouth bass. Researchers in Ontario (Suski and Ridgeway, 2009) placed acoustic transmitters inside smallmouth bass, and tracked their depth movements over multiple years. The results showed clear seasonal patterns in depth (with the deepest in winter), and virtually no overlap between the preferred depths between some seasons. In other words, successful fishing at one depth during one season would lead to getting skunked if you repeated the same methods in another. During a matter of days in spring, smallmouth transitioned from depths greater than 10 metres to less than one metre. The largest bass stayed deeper throughout the year. Fish showed predictable patterns of movement (from deep to shallow) between day and night during the summer. Overall, the data show that a successful angler needs to continually change lure depths to avoid fishing completely empty water.



At this point, you may be asking, “How do I use this information to catch more fish?” Well, there is no single answer, but there are a few simple take-home points to make your outings more efficient:

(1) It is impossible to catch a fish that is just not there. As we’ve seen, you could potentially catch many times more fish by just having your lure/fly at the right depth.

(2) Following on that idea, your first priority should be to ensure that you are fishing in a depth or area fish are most likely to favour. The most productive areas depend on factors like a fish’s preferred water temperature and oxygen concentration; forage-producing areas; and spawning migrations. You can do your own research by reading some of the many articles out there that describe these patterns for individual species, and how they change over the seasons.



(3) If you are not catching fish, consider changing your presentation (for example, the depth or spot you are fishing). Since fish continually change their behaviour, you need to adjust as well – what worked yesterday may not work today.  If you have ever used a strike indicator when fly-fishing on lakes, you might have observed how changing the depth of your fly pattern under the indicator by just 30 or 60 centimetres can make a big difference in the number of bites.



(4) Some fishing accessories can really help to locate fish, and to present your lure or fly exactly where they are. Today’s fish finders are very advanced, and can take out the guesswork. On small lakes, strike indicators – with proper weighting of flies – will help target a specific depth where fish are feeding. Downriggers are the preferred device for targeting fish at specific depths on B.C.’s larger lakes and reservoirs.

References
Post, J. R., Parkinson, E. A., & Johnston, N. T. (1998). Spatial and temporal variation in risk to piscivory of age‐0 rainbow trout: patterns and population level consequences. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 127(6), 932-942.

Suski, C. D., & Ridgway, M. S. (2009). Seasonal pattern of depth selection in smallmouth bass. Journal of Zoology, 279(2), 119-128.

Author: Paul Askey, Fisheries Scientist, Freshwater Fisheries Society of BC 

Photo Credit: "Rainbow Trout", Pavel Francev; "Tackle Box in Boat", Martin Vandeeden; "Trophy Lake", "Fish Finder", Glenn Gerbrandt; "Homemade Fishing Rod", Wayne Schofield; "Rainbow Trout with Fly", Derek Richardson